Spellbound will be directed by Vicky Jenson, director of Shrek and Shark Tale. In addition to Nicole Kidman and Javier Bardem, the Spellbound cast features John Lithgow, Nathan Lane, Jenifer Lewis, André De Shields, Jordan Fisher, and Rachel Zegler
Having recently worked together on About the Ricardos, Nicole Kidman and Javier Bardem are ready to share another film project. As Variety reports, the two Hollywood stars will lead the voice cast of Apple’s animated film Spellbound. Produced by Apple Original Films and Skydance Animation, the film will star Princess Elliana of Cumbria, on a mission to save her family and kingdom when a mysterious spell turns her parents into monsters and threatens to envelop Cumbria in eternal darkness.
Nicole Kidman will be the kind, righteous yet maniacal Queen Ellsmere, while Javier Bardem will be King Solon, a braggart with a heart of gold. Spellbound’s vocal cast will also include John Lithgow, Nathan Lane (Only Murders in the Building), Jenifer Lewis (Black-ish), and André De Shields (tick, tick… BOOM!) And Jordan Fisher. Lithgow and Lewis will be the princess’s royal advisors, Minister Bolivar, and Minister Nazara Prone.
Lane and De Shields will be the Oracles of the Sun and the Moon, which Ellian must find to break the spell. Fisher will be Callan, who will accompany Ellian on her adventure. Rachel Zegler protagonist of West Side Story and the next Snow White in the eponymous Disney live-action will be Princess Ellian.
Spellbound will be directed by Vicky Jenson, director of Shrek and Shark Tale, from a screenplay written by Lauren Hynek, Elizabeth Martin, and Linda Woolverton. Alan Menken, winner of eight Academy Awards, will write the original music and songs, with lyrics signed by Glenn Slater (Rapunzel, Ralph Breaks the Internet). John Lasseter, David Ellison, Dana Goldberg, and David Lipman will produce the film for Skydance Animation.
Ram Gopal Varma’s film is of interest to the audience at least on a small scale. It is not surprising that ‘Konda‘ has become more and more interesting as it is a film based on certain events in the life of Murali and Surekha. But no matter how much publicity was given before the release, the buyers were not eager to buy ‘Konda’. People did not flock to the theaters when it was released. How is the movie ‘Konda’ released in such a strange situation …
Story:
Konda Murali (Trigunna) could not stand to see injustice happening in front of his eyes. Responds immediately, physically. So Murali goes to his house and crushes a lover who is harassing girls in Ulu. The victim’s parents (Tulsi, LB Shriram) brainwashed him and sent him to study at Lal Bahadur College in Warangal.
Murali gets upset when he sees a student named Surekha (Irra More) there. It was there that he met RK (Prashant Karthi), who was working for the revolution. Seeing Murali’s aggression, Nalla Sudhakar (Prithvi), a local political leader, pulls him closer to him. Murali and Surekha get married. Sudhakar first wants Murali to work for the people, then realizes his true nature and comes out.
But Murali’s friend Kolli Pratap (Auto Ramprasad) stays with Sudhakar Panchani and backs Murali. Sudhakar attacks Murali with his own men according to the information given by him. Murali escapes with his life if he is hit by a bullet. What did Murali do after that, did he get revenge, or not? Is the rest of the story.
Analysis:
Ram Gopal Varma propagated that the name is the story of a Konda couple, but it is easy to see that it is more of a fiction than a fact. The world knows that Errabelli Dayakirao is the main enemy of Konda Murali. Hence the use of the name means that the character has been turned into a black facilitator to cause censorship problems. In this movie, Nalla Sudhakar plays the role of a villain.
In this movie, we see Sudhakar turning into a ball on the side of Murali and repeatedly trying to get rid of him, who is competing with him. In terms of characterizations .. Konda Murali and Nalla Sudhakar have made the characters a bit better than the rest of the characters. The stubbornness and courage of Murali are well shown to many in that role.
The Konda Surekha characterization is not at all impressive. The song that was filmed about her in college .. is not liked by anyone except those who have very bad taste. She took off her necklace and showed her navel and nipples and saw her splattering. If anyone presses their cheeks .. it is not their fault. Not only that, but the filming of all the songs is the worst. The killing of a scoundrel named Bandla Dora is shown through a song. Seeing the gestures of the characters in it, my heart breaks.
If you are watching a movie .. the feeling of being surrounded by Chaka Chaka will melt away regardless of whether the gestures of the actors are in line with the scene or whether there are any differences in the character style. Ramgopal Varma did not seem to need to shoot scenes at home. Kondokancho. It is doubtful whether these scenes were taken by Arjiviena.
When Surekha went to fetch Murali from the police station on bail, how could it be that the inspectors were staring at her while wiping their tongues .. not once but twice? And so .. Surekha went to Nalla Sudhakar to release Murali… “What should you give me?” Asks. Sudhakar says, “I’m not asking you to feed me, I’m asking you to feed me,” he laughs. Did real-life characters really behave the same way as Surekha? She must disclose this fact.
The conversations seemed impressive in some places and cheap in others. The vision is not at all impressive. D.Y.S.R. Failed to add strength to music scenes. The music of the songs is awful though. None of the five songs are naughty. Malhar Bhatt Joshi’s Cinematography seems to be fair. I do not know how hard it was for editor Manish Thakur to paste and cut the scenes. But what does he do?
Performance of the cast:
Trigun did justice to the character of Konda Murali. Demonstrated maturity in the matter of gestures. His body language is also good. Irra More is not seen in the role of Surekha. Her expressions often frighten me. Did she do it on purpose? Doubt. Prithviraj was rightly suited as Nalla Sudhakar. You have to see him when you laugh at Kisakisami.
The director was overreacting by Tulsi, who plays Murali’s mother. LB Shriram showed settled performance as a father. Auto Ramprasad as Kolli Pratap, who turned his back on Murali, and Prashant Karthi as Naxalite Archea did not look good.
Abhilash Chaudhary is OK as Inspector Riaz. Shravan Raghavendra did not get a chance to play the role of Inspector Gokul.
‘Konda’ movie is another example to say that the genius songs of Ram Gopal Varma as a director are in a backward direction. The storytelling, the characterizations, the composition of the scenes, and their portrayal must be heart-wrenching to enjoy a very crumbling ‘Konda’ movie. Mynobi small hearts are hard to bear.
Akash Puri, who is trying his best to become a hero, has now come forward with the movie ‘Chor Bazaar‘ directed by ‘George Reddy’ fame Jeevan Reddy. In addition to the songs, the recently released trailer signals that there is something in the film. Although father Puri Jagannath did not come to bless his son for the pre-release event, mother Lavanya came. The movie ‘Chor Bazaar’ along with Akash also made headlines after Bandla Ganesh said the same thing in his speech. How is it that the movie was released in such an atmosphere …
Story
The film revolves around a place called Chor Bazaar near Charminar in Hyderabad. There, the Bachchan Saab (Akash Puri) gang makes a living by committing petty thefts. Once from the State Museum, the Nizam Nawabs received A diamond worth Rs. 200 crore disappears. The Home Minister (Sunil) orders the police department to put it in place and put it back in the exhibition which will take place in another month. Bachchan, a childhood friend, and mutineer Simreen (Gehenna Sippy) fall in love with each other.
Simran is unaware that Bachchan is committing thefts. The missing diamond from the museum is found by a buddy in the Bachchan gang in the Bazaar. But everyone thinks of it as something ordinary stone. An international criminal, Charlie Gang, on the one hand, and the police, on the other, are searching for the diamond that reached Chor Bazaar. Who finally got that diamond? Bachchan, is Simran’s love happy, or not? The rest of the story is known.
Analysis
Director Jeevan Reddy presented ‘Chor Bazaar’ with a drama revolving around a diamond on the one hand and a bachelorette love story on the other. Diamond’s drama turned into a rhyme and annoyance as the screenplay went awry. Bachchan-Simran’s love story is heart-touching.. that is not it. All 60 families in Chor Bazaar are still alive after committing thefts.
Stealing from pocket purses to car tires and selling stolen goods at a low rate. But they are not the only thieves. The director portrayed them as having no more profit than those lost by their thefts. Chor Bazaar is not wrong in trying to show them in a humane sense. But shouldn’t it be impressively sweet! The director failed in that regard.
The whole movie is a bit confusing, with a lot of noise pollution, except for a few flashbacks and a few dialogues from the beginning of the movie to the end. The director was confused as to how to decipher the Bachchan Saab characterization. The pre-climax court scene is a mockery of Sean O’Brien’s speech by Bachchan about the Chor Bazaar men. The big minus for this film is that we do not sympathize with his character.
There is a possibility that the role of Bachchan’s mother Baby (Archana) is actually very well crafted. Her flashback episode, which was supposed to give an emotional feel, appeared to be a comedy. Simran’s character is somewhat well portrayed by the director. No matter how many people the Home Minister discusses, it’s unnatural that the diamond was stolen from the museum. If even the characters intended for comedy fail to do that… it’s the director’s fault!
The dialogues are impressive in some scenes. The music given by Suresh Bobbili for the songs is good, except for one item song. Even the filming of that song is not impressive at all. If the background score is good in some scenes, there is sound pollution in most scenes. Jagdish’s dark cinematography is colorful. If the editing was soso, the fights didn’t seem fair. Gandhi Nadikudikar’s artwork is good in Chor Bazaar.
Performance
Akash Puri played the role of Bachchan Saab. He understood the depth of the character and acted. Compared to previous films, he has matured in gestures. Excelled in emotional scenes. Voice is a big asset to him. In a good story, if he gets a good character… I can say that he will take a career turn. Yesterday’s heroine Archana excelled in the role of Bachchan’s mother-baby.
She’s crooked to the dance! Geena Sippy impresses as a dumb Simran. Sunil as Home Minister, Subbaraju as Gabber trying to shut down Chor Bazaar, and Sampurnesh Babu as Gangster Manja did justice to their roles. Zabardast comedians like Nalla Venu, Rachcha Ravi, Emmanuel, and Yadamma Raju have done their job. Lakshman Meesala appeared in a dual role as a prolific lawyer.
Jeevan Reddy who made the movie ‘George Reddy’ is very different from Jeevan Reddy who made the movie ‘Chor Bazaar’. The film manages to entertain as well as inform, with a lot of sound pollution in the film. Watching ‘Chor Bazaar’ till the end is like a test of patience.
Kiran Abbavaram is a young man who was introduced as a hero in ‘Rajavaru Ranigaru’. Received success with the first film. After that, he impressed the Telugu audience once again with ‘SR Kalyana Mandapam’. His latest film is ‘Sammathame‘. Chandini Chowdhary is the heroine of this Telugu movie. The promotional films and Shekhar Chandra’s music impressed the audience. And, how is the movie?
Story: Krishna (Kiran Abbavaram) is a young man who wants to seduce his wife after marriage. The girl who is going to get married does not want to have love affairs like in the past. He wants his fiance not to actually lie to him. She was a man who could not bear to be touched by another boy.
Seeing the relationship of the father (Goparaju Ramana), Shanvi (Chandini Chaudhary) goes to Vallinti for wedding looks. There Shanvi gets angry when she finds out that there is an affair in college. After that, he goes for another 20 bridal looks. Seeing any girl … Shanvila looks up and walks over to that girl again.
Shanvi is a modern young woman. Is reassuring. The drug is drunk. The girl did not have the qualities that Krishna wanted. With that, he starts imposing sanctions on her. What happened after that? After proposing to each other … when it came to engagement … why did Krishna say no to Shanvi? What is the reason? Which coast did this love story finally reach? Is it a must-see in the movie?
Analysis: An image that tells us to accept the people who come into our lives as they are. Some people want their spouses to be what we want them to be, to listen to what we say, and to do what they say. However … it is ‘correct’ to say that it is not correct to try on the other person with that desire. There have been some films in the past with storylines like this. And, what’s new in this movie?
How is the movie? (Sammathame Review): Shekhar Chandra’s voice is ‘Sammathame’. The background music is also ‘acceptable’. Is his voice, a film without music, acceptable? I mean … it’s hard to answer. Because … music is a feast for the senses in most scenes from beginning to end. Shekhar Chandra made the audience feel as if the scenes on the screen were really happening before our eyes. His music was well-suited to the story and the scenes.
When it comes to the story of ‘Sammatame’ … this is not a new story. But, the situations this generation of youth faces are in the film. Or else it seems to have happened in the lives of their friends. That’s it. The beginning of the movie is good. The fun went on until the rest. However … it seems that the story does not move forward and stretches until after the climactic scenes after that. Sometimes it seems that the hero does not understand the heroine’s quarrels.
The cultural difference between the hero and heroine until the break, and the scenes that come in the background are hilarious. After that again and again such scenes seem to be repeated. Another important thing is … the girl does not understand why she changed her method. There is some confusion about the conflict in the story. Saptagiri, the first Rajendran track stretched the story. Not even laughed at!
How did the cast ?: Kiran Abbavaram looked like the guy next door. He acted as a settler to suit the role in this film. Dialog delivery and timing are good. The emotional scene in the climax is okay. However … it would have been nice to have been emotionally elevated. Chandni Chowdhury does not seem to be acting. Was made to live in character.
Being a different girl may have meant experiencing the scenes in the story … or listening to the experiences her friends encountered. As such, Chandni Chowdhury did not appear. Character appeared. Anger was nicely expressed. Goparaju Ramana got a chance to act in a single scene before the climax. He did well in that. Annapoornamma, Sivanarayan, ‘Virally’ Ravi Teja, and others acted to suit the roles.
And last but not least, the headline made you read this article. That’s not to say that not all girls who take drugs are drug addicts. During this period some boys judged girls according to their dressing and lifestyle. If love is born between such a girl and a boy … is the story of the movie. The songs are good. The first half is good. The second half will be feeling somewhat stretched.
Again the climax is OK. Go to the cinema without any expectations. Can enjoy the fun for a while. It is difficult to make predictions by looking at songs and promotional images. Moments are better than story.
Satyadev is an actor who impresses the Telugu film industry with his new characters along with different stories. Godse is the latest movie in which he plays the hero. Let’s see in our movie review whether this movie released today impresses the audience or not.
As for the story…
Godse (Satyadev) kidnaps some big shots belonging to the state’s political and police departments respectively. Why did the original Godse kidnap those with these political crutches? The government has appointed police officer Veshali (Aishwarya Lakshmi) to liaise with criminals to consult with them in this regard. So why did Godse kidnap these bigshots? ? What was his goal? Did Godse finally achieve what he set out to do? That is the story of this movie.
As for the article…
Director Gopiganesh Pattabhi created attention to the film with the title ‘Godse’. The new story does not mean that. The story of Shankar Mark’s hero rebels against the injustices that take place in society. Movies like this have come a long way in the past. In particular, Shankar weaved the story in his own style by taking the line from the film Gentlemen and Shivaji films as well as the representative film. He also created a kind of intensity in the audience until the interval.
Routine hero flashback in the second half. He is a big businessman in London. He comes here to invest at the call of the government. The challenges facing him in this context. Many people nowadays do not get a job that suits their education. The director raises such a point. On the other hand, our politicians are investing in their own companies with the industrialists who come here to invest.
Especially with the dialogues that people will continue to be deceived as long as they know what political interests are hidden behind any slogan .. especially in a qualified assembly. The method must be in Parliament if it exists. Want a respectable mayor. Sujalam should be a polite sarpanch .. Dialogues explode where the hero says Sufalam Malayaja Sheetalam.
The film manages to entertain as well as inform. In addition, many political leaders in the country mentioned the events that are currently taking place in our Telugu states.
Not to mention how much was brought in from the center for the schemes ..? How much is brought in from the World Bank in the form of loans? How much did it cost in ground reality ..? How much did the suitcase move to the companies? The dialogues that make the hero depress public representatives make everyone think.
The details that politicians in our country submit in their election judicial affidavit during nomination are lies. In this, he boldly mentioned that if questioned in this country, it would make an impression. On the other hand, the background score for the film .. Camera work is good.
As for the cast…
Satyadev .. has made a name for himself as a talented actor. On the one hand, he is doing as a hero and on the other hand, he is doing character roles in other hero movies. Godse played the role wonderfully in this film. Aishwarya Lakshmi, who played the role of a police officer, was also impressed with her performance.
The rest of the cast of Tanikella Bharani seemed okay with their range. Nagababu shined in the role of governor in the climax. Especially if the Gods of that time .. killed the Mahatma .. the Gods of today .. killed the politicians in the guise of the Mahatmas.
Virata Parvam: After the Bhimla Nayak movie, the hero Rana came forward with the latest story … Furthermore, the recently released songs and the trailer further heightened that interest. The film, which was supposed to be released last year, has been postponed several times due to Corona. It finally came out this Friday (June 17). Let’s see how the public talk of this movie, which was released in the theaters amidst huge expectations, is.
The story, analysis…
The story of Virataparvam goes back to 1990-92. Vennela (Sai Pallavi) of Mulugu district is associated with the Naxalites at birth. Her mother (Ishwarirao) gives birth to Vennela amidst police and Naxalite crossfire. She was also nicknamed Purudu Poshi by a woman Maoist (Niveda Pethuraj). When she grows up, she reads books written by Aranya alias Ravanna (Rana Daggubati), a Maoist leader, and falls in love with him.
Unbeknownst to her, Vennela’s parents (Sai Chand, and Ishwarirao) arrange to marry her to her nephew (Rahul Ramakrishna). She runs away from home after telling her parents that she does not like the marriage and that she will stay with Ravanna. The whole village searches for Ravanna .. Suffers and finally meets her boyfriend. She shares her love affair with him.
Did Ravanna, who left family ties and went wild for the people, accept the love of Vennela? What were the problems encountered to meet the Maoists on the Vennela? One has to watch the movie once to get clarity on what caused the Vennela who turned into Naxalites with their love for Ravanna to finally die at their hands…
Vennela’s family background, upbringing, falling in love with Mugthuralai Ravanna for revolutionary literature .. leaving Kannavari for him .. Faustoff ends up finally getting caught by the police. When his father was attacked by the police .. vennela quarrel with them is impressive. Rana’s entry as Ravanna will be missed.
If the police try to snatch the hidden toy for Ravanna .. the work done by the Vennela to protect it will impress everyone. That one scene reveals how much she loves Ravanna. Vennela’s adventure to escape the Ravanna force from the police is the highlight of the First half. Although some scenes in Fast Stop seemed to be repeated, the heroine made the movie a hit with her mark.
The original story starts in the second half. Ravanna’s troop cleverly avoids the vennela in the police station. With the help of Professor Shakuntala (Nandita Das), she joins the force, which adds more speed to the story. Vennela’s fights with Bharatakka (Priyamani) and Raghanna (Naveen Chandra) are impressive. Ravanna escapes from the police by firing at Vennella during a shootout with his mother.
Vannela dies. Every character in the movie is highlighted by Suresh Bobbili’s music. The songs come along with the story, rather than being brought up. The background music however gave wonderfully. Divakarmani, Danny Sanchez Lopez ‘The cinematography is very good.
Rakshit Shetty is the hero who gave the name to typical Kannada movies. After the movie ‘Avane Sreemannarayana’ (‘Atade Sreemannarayana’ in Telugu) which came out in 2019, he came back to the audience with a special movie called 777 Charlie. The film caught the attention of the audience with its emphasis on the dog as well as the hero in the film. How is the movie?
Story: Dharma (Rakshit Shetty)’s parents die in a car accident as a child. Since then he has become accustomed to loneliness. He lives a shallow life working in a factory in his hometown. A dog comes into his life. Although he did not like it at first, gradually Dharma also developed a liking for the dog. He named it Charlie and raised it.
Meanwhile, Charlie has cancer and finds out that he will not live long. With this, Dharma wants to take Charlie to his favorite places before he dies. What caused the original Charlie to get cancer? Is Charlie alive? What happened to Dharma who was so attached to Charlie? You have to see 777 Charlie to know all this.
Analysis: Most of the dog-based movies that have come out so far show the emotion of dog and man. We have seen more and more about how loyal dogs are to humans and what their level of love is once they love their owner. But 777 Charlie is the story in reverse to this point.
The main point of the film is how much a man loves a dog. Director Kiran Raj shot the film very emotionally. It is an adventure to choose such a subject. However, Kiran Raj successfully achieved that feat. In some scenes tears well up in our eyes without us even knowing it.
The opening scenes between Rakshit Shetty and Charlie are hilarious. Rakshit Shetty’s troubles before he got used to the dog were shown as funny. As the bond between the two grows, the film becomes emotional. The ending that comes there is impressive even if the ending of the movie is predictable. The occasional unwanted scenes, however, are a bit of a minus as the melodrama becomes more in some scenes.
The songs and background music provided by Nobin Paul are impressive. Arvind Kashyap’s cinematography is also super. The scenes that come up especially in the Kashmir background are visually awesome. The film was produced without hesitation at a cost.
When it comes to the cast … the two main characters in this movie. Rakshit Shetty, the dog played by Charlie. This dog’s name is also Charlie. Rakshit Shetty impresses in emotional scenes. Especially at the climax but cries. This movie shows how good an actor he is. And Charlie also got amazing acting.
The fact that people are tweeting this movie to give awards to this dog too can understand how well it has acted. Rakshit Shetty acted so emotionally … Charlie also acted wonderfully. The rest of the cast did justice to their roles. Leading Tamil actor Bobby Sinha’s cameo is also impressive.
Overall … 777 Charlie is a movie you should definitely watch if you are a pet lover. If not here’s a new product just for you!
‘Kinnerasani’ is a movie starring Kalyan Dev (Kalyaan Dhev) in the lead role. Starring Ravindra Vijay, Un Sheetal, and Kashish Khan. Nagashourya ‘Ashwatthama’ fame Ramana Teja directed. ‘G5’ was released on OTT. How did Kalyan Dev do it? How is the movie? (Kinnerasani Movie Review)
Story (Kinnerasani Movie Story): Venkat (Kalyan Dev) Lawyer. He is very smart. A young man with talent. Veda (Unsheet) runs a library. Is searching to find out where his father is. Venkat helps her. If so … who is Jayadev (Ravindra Vijay) who is turning to kill Veda? Who was the cause of the death of Venkat Lover Lily (Kashish Khan)? If Venkat loves Lily … why is he helping her like a shadow along with the Vedas? What has the book ‘Kinnerasani’ got to do with the Vedas and the story of Venkat? Is the rest of the movie.
Analysis (Kinnerasani Review): ‘Kinnerasani’ … is an exceptionally well-received film. The songs and promotional images were released on YouTube three months ago. Audiences thought it would be released in theaters. Released in OTT for whatever reasons. How is the movie? Going into the matter of …
‘Kinnerasani’ … This is a murder mystery thriller. There would be no kick in telling such a story directly. However, magic was done with the screenplay to prevent such a feeling in the viewer. The movie begins with the murder of a girl. Who did it after that? To whom did the girl send a love mission with the puppy before she was murdered? The director who kept the elements in suspense … introduced the hero and heroine characters without any delay. Giving a thrill every fifteen minutes … took the movie forward.
The screenplay in the movie is good. Also, unsheathed characterization too! That being said … those who are going to watch the movie will not get a kick. As such, do not say! However, where do viewers question logic? In the intro scene, the hero is shown as a person who can control the thoughts in his mind.
Although the logic is correct … Impact is created when there is a hero who can show intensity in terms of performance. It was missed. The hero Flashback episode is too routine. There is nothing new in that. If the love scenes are in a way that makes an impact … then the viewers are immersed in the scenes. His flashback scenes have become effective due to Ravindra Vijay’s acting.
Congratulations to the director-writers and producers who made the film with confidence in the narrative without going into commercials and comedy. The songs provided by Mahathi Swara Sagar are okay. The theme music that is heard in the background music is good. The cinematography and production design are neat.
How did the actors do it ?: What is Kalyan Dev’s weakness as an actor? What is strength? Is well estimated by director Ramana Teja. The hero is not taken into the front seat in every scene. The hero is shown only when necessary. Compared to the two previous releases … Kalyan Dev looks a bit new. The acting still needs to be improved.
Kashish Khan’s character who plays Kalyan Dev’s girlfriend is short. As long as it looks modern. The heroine Ann Sheetal was given an important role. Emotions are well expressed to suit the character. Dominated in First Half. Ravindra Vijay once again impresses as an actor. He did justice to Jayadev’s character.
And last but not least, the movie is two hours long! Although … slowly moving forward. Being a routine story does not make you feel new. Unlike regular psycho killers. The treatment is good. Screenplay and thrills give a surprise. No comedy, no commercials. Therefore, a section of the audience only impresses fans of the thriller genre. ‘Kinnerasani’ is a better option for those who want to watch weekend murder mystery and thriller movies.
Nani is like the guy next door. So much so, that it pretends to be very natural. Received success every time he did characters like the guy next door. If you look at the promotional films and songs for ‘Ante Sundaraniki‘ … it seems to have played the role of an ordinary young man. In addition, the concept of a young Brahmin, a Christian girl falling in love, caught the attention of the audience. And, how is the movie (Telugu Movie Ante Sundaraniki Review)? What is the role of the heroine?
Story (Ante Sundaraniki Movie Story): Sundar Prasad (Nani), Leela Thomas (Nazriya Nazeem) Classmates. Sundar is a Brahmin family. Everyone in the house is a man of methods and matters. Livadi Christian Family. Leela means beautiful. However, he hesitates to say that thing before. After knowing that she has love in her heart … she will be ready to get married.
However, Sundar and Leela play two lies to convince the adults in the house. What are those lies? How did the two family members react after learning that what they both said was untrue? Finally, did Sundar-Leela get married? Or not? How many turns did their love journey take? Is the rest of the movie.
Analysis: A cricketer has a little more confidence when batting on the home ground. Easy to play. A movie like ‘Ante Sundaraniki’ is like a home ground for Nani. Director Vivek Atreya has shown his strength in comedy with his films Mental Madilo’ and ‘Brochevarevarura’. Being the home ground for the hero and the director, he hit sixes over sixes in comedy scenes. How are the story, narrative, and emotions? Going into the matter of …
How is the movie? (Ante Sundaraniki Review): The unit never tried to hide the main point in the story of ‘Ante Sundaraniki’. The love between a Brahmin boy and a Christian girl is revealed. Whose methods are they? Whose customs are they? How did you agree to receive rice from someone else? Is it a must-see in the movie? However, it took the director a long time to show that actual event.
Until the interval, the hero and heroine… explained their circumstances. Too much time is taken. The situation faced by the Brahmin youth due to Hindu traditions and customs is somewhat hilarious. However, it took a long time in terms to introduce the heroine character. Feeling stretched. Therefore, when you see Fastoff you get to feel OK OK. The real story begins in the second half. The cart climbs the rails. After that Nani, along with Nazriya, the director did not stop anywhere. The cart was carried forward in top gear.
The comedy scenes in the movie are good. However, the length has become longer. Also, the introduction to the heroine character seems to require a love track before the hero. The songs came as part of the story. The background music is much better than the songs. The cinematography is neat. Production values of Maitree Movie Makers are at a high level.
Vivek Atreya who hit sixes in comedy … could not even hit four in length. Biggest minus for the same movie. The Childhood episode was also shown at length. Laughing for a while … stretching after that? Feels … Audiences come out of theaters with a short message at the end. In the climactic scenes, it is as if Ford has brought emotion. However, the saying ‘Pregnancy is a choice but … not a compulsion’ touches the heart.
How did the actors do it ?: Nani played the role of Sundar with ease. Gave the best in every scene. Also, Nazriya too! Both acted naturally. Love appeared in the scenes between these two. It looks like two friends. Surprise means … Anupama Parameswaran’s character! Become a heroine … Acting in the role of a hero colleague is a great thing. If the character Arist had done that role instead of her … a wow factor would have been missed in theaters.
Naresh, Rohini, Nadia, Alagam Perumal … the four who acted as the parents of the hero and heroines did well. However, Harshavardhan is most remembered by everyone after coming out of the theater. Every scene between Nani and Harshavardhan was hilarious. Rahul Ramakrishna, Srikanth Iyengar, Prithvi, etc. appeared in the middle. Winnie the screen presence is good, the son of Shekhar Master who played the role of Hero Childhood.
And last but not least, the headline made you think of ‘Sundaraniki’. The first half can be trimmed. The simple story is told with a few twists. These days some families practice rituals and customs. However, do those who are under the illusion that something is going to happen if they cross the sea appear? There is no doubt that. That point is far from reality. However, there is plenty of entertainment. Nani and Nazriya were paired with director Vivek Atreya Maya. If you go without any expectations … you can come home laughing comfortably in the theaters.
Jurassic World Dominion ends – in part – the Jurassic Era that began in 1990 with the novel Jurassic Park by Michael Crichton which in 1993 became one of the most popular films by Steven Spielberg was followed by: The Lost World in 1997 always by Spielberg, based on the second novel of the same name, and 2001’s Jurassic Park 3 directed by Joe Johnston. The original trilogy has decided, starting from 2015, to give rise to a new Jurassic saga focused on the events of the famous Jurassic World park with the events narrated in Jurassic World (2015).
Jurassic World: The Fallen Kingdom (2018), and Jurassic World: Dominion (2022) directed by Colin Trevorrow. Along with the six films, it is worth mentioning the presence of a delightful Netflix original animated series: Jurassic World: Camp Cretaceous still under construction with four seasons under its belt. With Jurassic World 3, the second trilogy comes to its conclusion in a completely unexpected way. We previewed the film and this is our no spoiler opinion.
The events narrated in Jurassic World: Dominion takes place four years after the destruction of Isla Nublar, dinosaurs live and hunt together with humans all over the world. This fragile balance will reshape the future and determine, once and for all, whether humans remain the dominant predators on a planet they now share with history’s most fearsome creatures.
It is well known that the Jurassic World saga never shone, but despite the ailments of the previous films, the films were ultimately enjoyable and particularly entertaining, albeit far from the concept of “Jurassic Park”. With the ending of the second film, the cards on the table were particularly interesting given the “return” of the dinosaurs to the civilized world, which had immediately winked at the finale of The Lost World in which a t-rex sowed panic in the city, sequence among the most popular of the entire film saga.
Dominion, starting from these premises, introduces us to a world in which humans, animals, and dinosaurs have learned to coexist in a sort of forced ecosystem with many difficulties. If at the base the concept is interesting and full of creative ideas, the realization and the inventiveness dedicated to the project do not meet expectations in any way, not even thanks to the return of the original cast.
Laura Dern, Sam Neil, and Jeff Goldblum return for the first time since 1993 to chase – and be chased by – dinosaurs but losing quite a few hits. In a period in which the nostalgia effect is abused, Il Dominio, while being able to focus in part on this aspect, decides almost completely to leave it out, leaving the iconic characters of the saga at the mercy of the action without a real backbone or a precise characterization.
The fault of this is undoubtedly a screenplay aimed much more at entertainment than history. Dominion is in all respects the sequel to the Fallen Kingdom, the story of the young Lockwood, the granddaughter of the co-founder of Jurassic Park, is resumed and deepened, but everything is dealt with in a completely different way from what the films of the saga original and the sequel saga we were used to.
Watching Jurassic World: Dominion will seem to be in front of an action film, in the style of Mission: Impossible or The Bourne Identity with the addition of some dinosaurs in the background. The “human” events have the upper hand, overshadowing what really interests this saga. To make matters worse, those creatures take over so out of focus given the fold of the film that they seem completely useless to the development of the plot.
Creatures that, due to the continuous genetic changes carried out by humans, have considerably changed their original form, so much so that they seem like real “Fantastic Beasts”. The very realization of the latter leaves in some moments decidedly disappointed if you think about the perfection that the dinosaurs had in the previous films, especially in the first two films of the original saga.
However, there are still some good action scenes starring the loving Velociraptor chasing the increasingly static Chris Pratt on a motorcycle on what should be the island of Malta that ends up resembling a Moroccan city. The fast pace, a good dose of action, and some well-made sequences are not enough to revive the fortunes of a film whose direction is not very clear.
Several times during the film, one wonders if what one is watching will actually have a more or less significant value on the implication of the story, a problem that a final chapter should not have. The same characters, completely at the mercy of events, are not very empathetic and devoid of any interest both in staging their story and in transmitting their emotions, a feeling that in turn is reflected on the viewer who comes out weighed down and bewildered.
Jurassic World: Dominion is an odd and hasty conclusion to a trilogy that, although it had never shone over the years, had nevertheless managed to entertain and make spectators dream with the presence of the iconic dinosaurs. The last chapter of the saga decides to take an unexpected path by completely detaching itself from the other films, staging a decidedly out-of-focus story for the type of franchise proposed.
The same characters, old and new, seem to disappear in the face of a story that prefers to exceed from the visual point of view rather than that of the story. Good action scenes, tight editing, and a few moments of nostalgia (which, if used well, could have made a difference) are not enough to make this final chapter a memorable film.
